Cited at 3,204 of 56,625 graded Chicago inspections — 5.7% of them, the 21st most common violation in the city. Inspections citing it fail 33.1% of the time against a 27.5% baseline, making it a mild signal.
Violation 40 appears on the Chicago Department of Public Health’s inspection checklist as “Personal Cleanliness.” Its position on that form places it in the priority foundation band — the city does not publish a severity field, so this is inferred from the code number, which is how the form itself is ordered.
Priority foundation violations cover the procedures, equipment and training that make food safety controls possible — the things that have to be in place for a priority item to be met.
Ranked by how often it is written up, violation 40 is 21st of 50. Ranked by how strongly it predicts a failure, it is 44th. It is written up far more than its risk warrants — a common finding, and the reason a long violation list is not by itself alarming.
What is violation 40 in a Chicago health inspection?
Violation 40, "Personal Cleanliness", is one of the numbered items on the Chicago Department of Public Health's inspection checklist. By its position on that form it falls in the priority foundation band. Priority foundation violations cover the procedures, equipment and training that make food safety controls possible — the things that have to be in place for a priority item to be met.
Is violation 40 serious?
Measured against outcomes, it is a mild signal. Inspections citing violation 40 ended in a failure 33.1% of the time, against a 27.5% baseline across 56,625 graded Chicago inspections — 1.2× ordinary risk. It is worth noting, but it is not on its own a reason to avoid a restaurant.
How common is violation 40?
It is the 21st most-cited violation in Chicago, appearing at 3,204 of 56,625 graded inspections since 2022 — 5.7% of them.
Can a restaurant fail an inspection for violation 40 alone?
Sometimes. Priority foundation violations can fail an inspection, particularly when several appear together or when a previous one was left uncorrected.
The city publishes the records but not these rates. They were derived from 56,625 inspections since 2022 with a graded result of Pass, Pass w/ Conditions or Fail, with each violation string parsed for its leading code number. The rate above is the share of inspections citing violation 40 that ended in a failure. A single inspection commonly cites several violations, so codes are not mutually exclusive. Anyone can reproduce this from the dataset linked above.