Cited at 838 of 56,625 graded Chicago inspections — 1.5% of them, the 35th most common violation in the city. Inspections citing it fail 54.1% of the time against a 27.5% baseline, making it a meaningful signal.
Violation 21 appears on the Chicago Department of Public Health’s inspection checklist as “Proper Hot Holding Temperatures.” Its position on that form places it in the priority band — the city does not publish a severity field, so this is inferred from the code number, which is how the form itself is ordered.
Priority violations address the most direct routes to foodborne illness — temperature control, contamination, sick employees, unsafe sourcing. A single one can fail an inspection on its own.
Ranked by how often it is written up, violation 21 is 35th of 50. Ranked by how strongly it predicts a failure, it is 18th. It matters considerably more than its frequency suggests, which makes it easy to overlook on a busy report.
What is violation 21 in a Chicago health inspection?
Violation 21, "Proper Hot Holding Temperatures", is one of the numbered items on the Chicago Department of Public Health's inspection checklist. By its position on that form it falls in the priority band. Priority violations address the most direct routes to foodborne illness — temperature control, contamination, sick employees, unsafe sourcing. A single one can fail an inspection on its own.
Is violation 21 serious?
Measured against outcomes, it is a meaningful signal. Inspections citing violation 21 ended in a failure 54.1% of the time, against a 27.5% baseline across 56,625 graded Chicago inspections — 1.97× ordinary risk. It is worth noting, but it is not on its own a reason to avoid a restaurant.
How common is violation 21?
It is the 35th most-cited violation in Chicago, appearing at 838 of 56,625 graded inspections since 2022 — 1.5% of them.
Can a restaurant fail an inspection for violation 21 alone?
Yes. Priority violations address the most direct routes to foodborne illness, and a single one can fail an inspection on its own.
The city publishes the records but not these rates. They were derived from 56,625 inspections since 2022 with a graded result of Pass, Pass w/ Conditions or Fail, with each violation string parsed for its leading code number. The rate above is the share of inspections citing violation 21 that ended in a failure. A single inspection commonly cites several violations, so codes are not mutually exclusive. Anyone can reproduce this from the dataset linked above.